Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Smart Capital Blueprint
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:03:31
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- America, we have a problem. People aren't feeling engaged with their work
- Is There Something Amiss With the Way the EPA Tracks Methane Emissions from Landfills?
- A Personal Recession Toolkit
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Congress tightens U.S. manufacturing rules after battery technology ends up in China
- Microsoft applications like Outlook and Teams were down for thousands of users
- The great turnaround in shipping
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- On California’s Coast, Black Abalone, Already Vulnerable to Climate Change, are Increasingly Threatened by Wildfire
Ranking
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Cosmetic surgeon who streamed procedures on TikTok loses medical license
- A ‘Polluter Pays’ Tax in Infrastructure Plan Could Jump-Start Languishing Cleanups at Superfund Sites
- Mung bean omelet, anyone? Sky high egg prices crack open market for alternatives
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- These formerly conjoined twins spent 134 days in the hospital in Texas. Now they're finally home.
- How 'modern-day slavery' in the Congo powers the rechargeable battery economy
- Prosecutors say man accidentally recorded himself plotting wife's kidnapping
Recommendation
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Ex-staffer sues Fox News and former Trump aide over sexual abuse claims
If You're a Very Busy Person, These Time-Saving Items From Amazon Will Make Your Life Easier
Read Emma Heming Willis’ Father’s Day Message for “Greatest Dad” Bruce Willis
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
Inside Clean Energy: Here Is How Covid Is Affecting Some of the Largest Wind, Solar and Energy Storage Projects
This drinks festival doesn't have alcohol. That's why hundreds of people came
Ditch Drying Matte Formulas and Get $108 Worth of Estée Lauder 12-Hour Lipsticks for $46